The Chinese language authorities has banned all on-line gross sales of the Christian Bible, the New York Instances reported Thursday.
I even had $130 in beermoney earnings there. So silly.. I used to be only a regular amazon person.. by no means had a vendor account … by no means had mturk as a result of I’m 17… so how did I “break US export legal guidelines and laws”?… Amazon is the dumbest website I’ve ever had expertise with.
Right here’s a screenshot of the e-mail I acquired 2 hours in the past.. solely acquired three emails in 10 months and I made 40 telephone calls and 20 emails and chats that went nowhere.
Anybody know what might’ve brought on this / what I can do now?
Edit : I’m additionally from the US so I don’t perceive why or how I may very well be breaking any export legal guidelines or laws.
The Washington Post reviews that analysts on the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC) had been handed a listing of “forbidden” phrases at a current assembly with senior CDC officers accountable for the funds. In accordance with the Publish‘s write-up, the Trump administration has insisted that these phrases can not seem “in any official paperwork being ready for subsequent yr’s funds.”
The seven forbidden phrases are as follows:
The assembly was spearheaded by Alison Kelly, a senior official within the CDC’s Workplace of Monetary Companies. In accordance with the Publish‘s supply, Kelly “didn’t say why the phrases are being banned … and informed the group that she was merely relaying the data.”
After all, given the character of those phrases, it’s clear that the motivation is political. There is no such thing as a motive to exclude the phrases “evidence-based” and “science-based” from paperwork for an company which has “conduct[ing] essential science and provid[ing] well being info” as a part of its mission statement, and whose pledge to the American people contains “bas[ing] all public well being selections on the very best high quality scientific information that’s derived brazenly and objectively.”
The exclusion of “fetus” is a blatant nod to the anti-choice motion, and the exclusion of “transgender” is yet one more transfer by an administration decided to erase LGTBQIA individuals from the military, the workplace, and federal data collection.
Stating that everybody within the assembly was “incredulous” once they heard concerning the ban, the Publish‘s supply emphasised that that is is extraordinary: “In my expertise, we’ve by no means had any pushback from an ideological standpoint.”
Nevertheless, this isn’t fairly true. Because the 1990s, the CDC has labored beneath one other onerous, right-wing restriction on their analysis. The Dickey Modification, named for its writer Consultant Jay Dickey (R-AK), has made its method into each omnibus spending invoice because it was first added in 1996. This modification stipulates that, as a part of the CDC’s appropriations, “not one of the funds made out there for damage prevention and management on the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention could also be used to advocate or promote gun management.”
In 2015, Dickey publicly acknowledged that he regretted the best way the modification stifled analysis, and wrote an op-ed in The Washington Publish urging “that scientific analysis must be performed into stopping firearm accidents and that methods to forestall firearm deaths might be discovered with out encroaching on the rights of authentic gun house owners.”
However Congress has continued to authorize the Dickey Modification.
One hopes that public outcry will power the Trump administration to reverse this determination. Public outcry has beforehand pressured the administration to backtrack on various points, inluding allowing ivory hunting trophies to be dropped at the U.S., deleting climate science pages from the EPA web site, nixing a requirement to trace greenhouse gasoline emissions from automobiles and vans, and eliminating funding to a program that helps homeless veterans.
The CDC does essential, life-saving work. That work ought to by no means be stifled by nonsensical, ideological restrictions on accepted scientific terminology.
Need extra tales like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!
—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, however just isn’t restricted to, private insults towards anybody, hate speech, and trolling.—
Over the previous 24 hours, some Twitter customers had their profiles changed with a discover saying their accounts had been now being “withheld in: Worldwide.”
The “country withheld” program run by Twitter sometimes prevents customers primarily based in a selected nation from from seeing tweets despatched by a withheld account. This was the primary time folks may recall the corporate withholding accounts globally, which was in impact a complete ban for the person.
That is what the timeline for @KDScioscia, an account with greater than 9,000 followers, confirmed till Twitter reactivated it, shortly earlier than this story was revealed:
On the time of writing, BuzzFeed Information had recognized 21 accounts that had been being withheld worldwide, and customers on Twitter had been starting to surprise if this was a brand new technique being utilized by the corporate to droop accounts.
However a Twitter spokesperson tells BuzzFeed Information that the worldwide withholdings had been actually the results of a bug.
“We’ve recognized a bug that incorrectly impacted sure accounts. We’ve recognized a repair, are working to resolve the problem, and anticipate it will likely be totally resolved shortly,” the spokesperson advised BuzzFeed Information.
A supply acquainted with the corporate advised BuzzFeed Information that the bug affected “a small quantity of accounts.”
Whereas apparently not intentional, the sudden ban of customers was seen by some as one other instance of the corporate’s stepped-up efforts to average content material and habits on its platform. Together with eradicating verified examine marks from white nationalist accounts, the platform now seems to be faster to droop accounts for what it claims are violations of its insurance policies. This has resulted in some confusion and criticism. An account belonging to a BuzzFeed Information journalist was recently suspended for an previous tweet she says was satirical, and that was mass reported by trolls making an attempt to get her booted from Twitter.
One person whose account was withheld worldwide claimed she was provided that standing after sending a tweet vital of writer JK Rowling. She shared a screenshot of a message from Twitter informing her that she “violated our guidelines in opposition to hateful conduct.”
Twitter / Through Twitter: @4lternate_facts
Her account, and the others recognized by BuzzFeed Information, are actually again on-line.
Roger Stone is one in every of President Trump’s most vicious assault canines, whose bark has all the time been worse than his chunk. However the canine has been muzzled, no less than by Twitter. Stone has been suspended from utilizing the social media platform, and in response to Buzzfeed it’s a permanent ban.
I awakened right this moment and located $60 credit score was added to my account. I am pretty sure this was from a spotlight group I discovered by the app and took part in on-line just a few weeks in the past, they have been providing $40 simply to take part in chat for an hour and thirty minutes and an additional $20 to incorporate a video response, which I did.
Anyway, I used to be fast to money out since I’ve learn that retaining credit in your account could also be a flag to get your account deactivated. I solely managed to take out $30 earlier than I began getting an error telling me to attempt once more later or contact assist, which I think will likely be fruitless. I’ve solely had the app for a month, and I do know I am properly beneath redeeming $600. I can nonetheless log in and take surveys, simply cannot redeem. Is that this like a precursor to a full ban and will I simply kiss the remainder of my focus group credit score goodbye or is $30/three present codes a day just a few type of restrict I wasn’t conscious of?
On one other word, I used to be 50% by a $25 meal logging survey by QT and it mysteriously disappeared right this moment too. 🙁 Was engaged on it for five days.
London taxi drivers block Whitehall in Westminster, central London, throughout a protest over the regulation of personal rent vehicles utilizing the Uber app.
Dominic Lipinski / PA Archive/PA Photos
After a protracted marketing campaign by London's black-cab drivers, Transport for London has decided not to renew Uber's licence to commerce as a personal rent enterprise, successfully banning it from the capital.
Uber has been lively in London since 2012 and has constructed a enterprise with, it claims, three.5 million prospects and 40,000 drivers. TfL was contemplating granting it a brand new five-year licence. However as a substitute, its final day in operation right here will probably be 30 September. It has 21 days to attraction.
It's an enormous second within the evolution of the so-called gig economic system and an enormous take a look at of how governments and regulators can halt the fast-paced development of client expertise because it disrupts conventional industries. Listed here are some extra questions, and a few (temporary) solutions:
Laura Dale / PA Wire/PA Photos
TfL has instructed Uber it gained't get a brand new personal rent operator licence – the factor it must proceed to function within the metropolis – as a result of the transport physique considers the corporate “not match and correct” to have one, attributable to “potential public security and safety implications”.
TfL got here to this choice for 4 causes:
In brief, Uber is dealing with a ban as a result of it broke the principles as set out within the Personal Rent Automobiles (London) Act 1998, not due to its remedy of drivers or passengers.
Metropolis Corridor has been eager to step up the regulation of taxi and personal automotive drivers since Khan's election – in December it hired 50 new officers to verify drivers and corporations have been sticking to the principles and had all the appropriate paperwork.
Dominic Lipinski / PA Archive/PA Photos
The New York Instances revealed in March this year that Uber was utilizing a software program program known as Greyball to successfully cease native licensing officers from utilizing the service.
The system was designed to cease individuals who would possibly threaten violence towards drivers, or rivals posing as peculiar passengers, from utilizing the app. It labored by serving a faux model of the app that allowed vehicles to be hailed however routinely cancelled them earlier than they arrived.
As TfL places it, this was “software program that could possibly be used to dam regulatory our bodies from gaining full entry to the app and stop officers from enterprise regulatory or regulation enforcement duties.”
Uber announced it would stop using Greyball days after it was uncovered, and Uber mentioned on Friday it has by no means been used within the UK. However this wasn't sufficient to appease TfL or London mayor Sadiq Khan, who backs the choice.
The TfL choice is newest in a string of PR disasters for Uber in 2017, which included former CEO Travis Kalanick apologising for a lack of diversity after claims of office sexism and apologising once more after being caught on digital camera yelling at an Uber driver who complained about modifications to his contract costing him cash.
An Uber bus parked on the Imperial Warfare Museum in Manchester.
Eamonn & James Clarke / Eamonn and James Clarke/PA Photos
Uber is in 40 cities and cities throughout the UK, and after at present's choice…that gained't change.
TfL is the licensing authority for taxis and personal rent vehicles in London however has no jurisdiction outdoors it.
Transport for Larger Manchester is the most important transport authority outdoors the capital, however it might't resolve whether or not to ban Uber or not – that's as much as particular person councils, and up to now they’re all fairly relaxed about ride-sharing.
A TfGM spokesperson mentioned: “Not like Transport for London, TfGM doesn’t license taxi or personal rent automobiles, companies or drivers. The licensing of taxis and personal rent automobiles and their drivers is managed individually by every of the native authorities in Larger Manchester.”
Plus, Uber splits up its regional companies into separate corporations – it's simply Uber London Restricted that gained't have a licence after subsequent week.
Councillor Nigel Murphy, government member for neighbourhoods on Manchester metropolis council, instructed BuzzFeed Information: “We now have a strong licensing system in place in Manchester, which ensures that every one of our licence holders are vetted to a excessive customary. Uber Britannia – which is a separate firm to Uber London – is licensed to function in Manchester till 2021 as a personal rent operator.
“As is the case with all licensees, we’ll proceed to watch their compliance with the situations of their licence to function, whereas on the similar time monitoring occasions as they unfold within the capital.”
Andrew Matthews / PA Archive/PA Photos
Uber has mentioned it’ll attraction the choice and is more likely to find yourself within the courts. It might nonetheless function whereas the attraction is pending – so there's no instant finish in sight and there could possibly be a prolonged authorized battle forward.
And that is hardly the corporate's first encounter with metropolis regulators.
Each Uber and Lyft, an identical service, pulled out of Austin, Texas, in 2016 after the town's voters rejected a proposal that may have allowed them to self-regulated background checks on drivers.
However they returned in July this year after a regulation change, and at decrease costs than earlier than too. It could possibly be that the identical factor will occur in London: Uber might conform to modifications to its phrases and providers after which return afterward.
Khan's assertion on Friday, which mentioned “any operator of personal rent providers in London must play by the principles”, seems to trace that Uber is simply dropping its licence as a result of it broke the principles, not due to what critics see as inherent ethical flaws within the firm's mannequin.
London isn't the primary European metropolis to protest at Uber's presence. The corporate was the subject of taxi drivers' anger in of violent protests in Paris in 2015; Uber mentioned in March this 12 months that it was pulling out of Denmark, the place it had 1000’s of drivers, due to “unworkable” modifications to taxi guidelines; and in April this 12 months a courtroom ruling banned the service in Italy.
Say what you’ll in regards to the present administration or about efforts to suppress varied media shops, however we in the USA do expertise true freedom of press to a a lot bigger and realer extent than journalists and artists in sure overseas international locations. Censorship is an idea we’re all acquainted with, however the diploma of censorship which People might have skilled firsthand is usually extremely watered down compared to that which exists underneath totalitarian or aggressively conservative regimes.
Take, for instance, the style of Korean pop, extra generally often known as Okay-Pop. A dictatorship North Korea famously and often censors media and popular culture shops, nonetheless, to some extent, censorship of on-line content material, music movies, and lyrics additionally happens often in South Korea as properly. The controversial division of the South Korean authorities, the Ministry of Gender Equality and Households, has reportedly performed an energetic position within the censorship or outright banning of hundreds of Okay-Pop songs all through the final decade.
Censorship in Okay-Pop is exclusive in that whereas it additionally impacts male teams, from BTS to Tremendous Junior and SHINee, the breed of video censorship the South Korean authorities has put in place is clearly gendered, and appears to preferentially goal feminine teams to their detriment. Particularly, dance strikes or ensembles in music movies that evoke sexual themes or may very well be seen as expressions of dominant, overt feminine sexuality are sometimes banned from broadcast, airwaves, and streaming. Equally, lyrics which may very well be construed as “racy” can be eradicated from songs, or in any other case suppressed. Whereas there are parallel censorship insurance policies in place for male Okay-Pop teams as properly, they’re not often as restrictive or as actively enforced—usually, the laws revolve round not displaying an excessive amount of pores and skin, no nipples for instance, though this rule appears to be extra versatile than most within the instances of sure all-male group movies.
There are dozens of “banned” dances by feminine Okay-Pop teams. Some examples of dances which were censored observe. From high to backside: RANIA with “DR Really feel Good,” EXIDS with “UP&DOWN,” and AOA with “Miniskirt.”
As compared, music movies within the U.S. appear near pornographic in nature. Simply have a look at Katy Perry’s “Bon Appetit,” (that includes a bunch of cooks kneading her half-naked self like bread dough and actually basting her ass) or any variety of movies from feminine pop stars recognized for dancing provocatively in leotards—Beyoncé, Girl Gaga, and Rihanna are all responsible. We are able to even go approach again to movies like Benny Benassi’s “Satisfaction” the place bikini-clad fashions bounce round on jack hammers, or the White Stripe’s “I Simply Don’t Know What to Do with Myself” that’s actually only a black and white video of Kate Moss pole dancing. As an outsider trying in, that stage of inventive censorship is sort of unfathomable. From a social perspective, it is very important observe not solely the injustice of the censorship itself, however of its focused, gendered high quality, which reveals simply how a lot room for enchancment in the direction of equality our modern society has.