Capital Gazette Shooting Suspect Was IDed Using Controversial Facial Recognition Database

Regulation enforcement officers in Maryland used facial recognition expertise to establish the suspected shooter believed to be liable for killing 5 employees members and injuring at the least two others within the workplaces of newspaper firm Capital Gazette on Thursday.

Read more…

Source link

قالب وردپرس

Here's The First Look At Damian Lewis As Toronto's Controversial Former Mayor Rob Ford

The star of Homeland and Billions spent seven hours with a make-up staff to play Canada’s notorious crack-smoking mayor.

That is Damian Lewis, the English actor and star of Homeland and Billions.

This is Damian Lewis, the English actor and star of Homeland and Billions.

Alberto Rodriguez / Getty Photos

That is Rob Ford, the late mayor of Toronto who turned internationally notorious when he was filmed smoking crack.

This is Rob Ford, the late mayor of Toronto who became internationally infamous when he was filmed smoking crack.

Mark Blinch / Reuters

And THIS contemporary horror is an image of Lewis sporting some unimaginable/terrifying prosthetics to play Ford within the upcoming film Run This City.

And THIS fresh horror is a picture of Lewis wearing some incredible/terrifying prosthetics to play Ford in the upcoming movie Run This Town.



When the casting for the film was first introduced earlier this month, it generated some rather WTF headlines.

When the casting for the movie was first announced earlier this month, it generated some rather WTF headlines.

However after Lewis spent seven hours in make-up to rework into Ford, he was unrecognizable in these contemporary pictures from the Toronto set.

But after Lewis spent seven hours in makeup to transform into Ford, he was unrecognizable in these fresh photos from the Toronto set.

Ford died in 2016 after a path of controversies throughout his unlikely stint as Toronto’s mayor. The pugnacious conservative politician admitted to substance abuse however was nonetheless admired by some in Canada for championing the working class and railing towards political correctness.

Ford died in 2016 after a trail of controversies during his unlikely stint as Toronto's mayor. The pugnacious conservative politician admitted to substance abuse but was still admired by some in Canada for championing the working class and railing against political correctness.

Fred Thornhill / Reuters

Run This City, which additionally stars Ben Platt, presently has no scheduled launch date. Director Ricky Tollman has mentioned the film takes place towards the background of Ford’s tenure as mayor, however he is not the primary character and it is not a biopic.

Run This Town, which also stars Ben Platt, currently has no scheduled release date. Director Ricky Tollman has said the movie takes place against the background of Ford's tenure as mayor, but he isn't the main character and it isn't a biopic.

Mark Blinch / Reuters

LINK: Rob Ford, Former Toronto Mayor And City Councillor, Dead At 46

LINK: Rob Ford: The Honest Liar

Source link

قالب وردپرس

The Guy Who Helped Create India’s Controversial National ID Program Leaked His Own Data, And It’s Still Online

Nandan Nilekani

Manjunath Kiran / AFP / Getty Pictures

Three years after Nandan Nilekani, the high-profile tech entrepreneur who helped create India’s controversial biometric id program referred to as Aadhaar, publicly tweeted his personal confidential Aadhaar ID, his private data continues to be available on-line, BuzzFeed Information has realized.

An Aadhaar ID, which is related to private data like your handle and birthdate, and is linked to companies reminiscent of your checking account, tax information, cellphone quantity, and insurance coverage, is like an extreme form of a social security number within the US, which can be linked to your biometric information.

From 2009 to 2014, Nilekani served as the pinnacle of the Distinctive Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), the federal government company accountable for administering Aadhaar. This system goals to create a digital nationwide id system by amassing the non-public particulars and biometrics — all 10 fingerprints and iris scans — of 1.three billion Indian residents right into a government-owned database. Critics have slammed Aadhaar, saying it violates privateness, permits state surveillance, and exposes residents to id theft.

Nilekani uncovered himself to id theft by tweeting an image of his personal Aadhaar card on April 12, 2014. He blacked out the primary eight digits of his 12-digit Aadhaar quantity, however didn’t obscure the QR code containing his private demographic particulars that might be learn by any freely out there iOS or Android app used for scanning QR codes.

And as with absolutely anything that’s publicly tweeted, Nilekani’s non-public data stays on-line. Members of an web discussion board widespread with laptop programmers scanned his QR code and posted his demographic particulars and Aadhaar quantity, and this information finally ended up on at the least half a dozen different internet pages that BuzzFeed Information reviewed. Pictures of Nilekani’s tweet together with his Aadhaar card exist on at the least one widespread web site.

Regardless of a number of individuals on Twitter stating a possible breach of privateness, Nilekani’s tweet remained on Twitter at the least by September 2016, when he lastly deleted it.

“I suppose Nandan didn’t notice what he had executed at first,” mentioned Prasanto Okay Roy, a former expertise journalist who was one of many individuals who alerted Nilekani. “And I don’t suppose he paid a lot consideration to it even when it was flagged, most likely pondering that it wasn’t a giant deal since, as a widely known individual and the pinnacle of the Aadhaar program, most of his demographic particulars have been publicly out there anyway. I believe he should have realized the seriousness of it later — that his tweet would possibly counsel to others that it was OK to publish an image of your Aadhaar card just by redacting the Aadhaar quantity itself.”

In September 2016, India’s authorities handed the Aadhaar Act to manipulate this system, which made publishing an Aadhaar quantity publicly a felony offence.

Nilekani didn’t reply to BuzzFeed Information’ requests for remark. However a supply near him mentioned underneath the situation of anonymity that they suggested him to take down his tweet for nearly six months — beginning a number of months earlier than the Aadhaar Act was launched — earlier than it was lastly deleted.

A screenshot of Nilekani's tweet. (BuzzFeed Information redacted the figuring out QR code.)

Consultants mentioned that Nilekani’s leaked Aadhaar quantity leaves him susceptible to id fraud as a result of the Indian authorities requires residents to hyperlink their Aadhaar numbers to important companies like meals subsidies, utilities, financial institution accounts, cellphone numbers, and insurance coverage companies.

“Private information reminiscent of full names, birthdates, and residential addresses ought to at all times be afforded a excessive stage of safety,” cybersecurity professional Troy Hunt advised BuzzFeed Information. “For many individuals, that is data they received’t wish to share past approved events as a result of it may be used to find them or assist in id theft.”

BuzzFeed Information, as an illustration, was capable of finding out the place Nilekani does his banking through the use of a publicly out there, UIDAI-provided service that lets anybody merely punch in an Aadhaar quantity on a cell phone to see the financial institution accounts it’s linked to.

Certainly, regardless of the UIDAI’s repeated denials, Aadhaar numbers leaked on-line have been used to commit id theft in India. In October 2017, as an illustration, Indian police arrested a bunch that used the leaked Aadhaar numbers of practically 300 pensioners to open financial institution accounts of their names and swindled over 4 million Indian rupees value of pension cash over two years, according to reports.

Making issues murkier is the UIDAI’s conflicting messaging about whether or not an Aadhar ID is definitely non-public data or not. After The Tribune published an investigation revealing the way it was capable of purchase unauthorized entry to the demographic particulars of practically 1.2 billion Indians within the Aadhaar database earlier this week, the UIDAI said having somebody’s Aadhaar quantity and demographic data was “not a safety risk” with out additionally having their biometric data. However a day later, the company sent out a tweet cautioning most of the people in regards to the significance of preserving Aadhaar numbers confidential.

“Their declare about demographic data being ineffective with out biometrics is just not true,” mentioned Pranesh Prakash, coverage director on the Centre for Web and Society, a Bangalore-based suppose tank. “Having this type of data out there publicly permits anybody to achieve sufficient information about you to impersonate you, as a result of there are particular particulars like your date of beginning, as an illustration, which might be typically used right now by locations like banks to be sure you are who you say you might be.”

Extra importantly, the Aadhaar Act itself permits for 3 forms of authentication to confirm an individual’s id: matching an Aadhaar quantity with a linked fingerprint or iris, with a one-time code despatched to a linked cellular quantity, or with a linked piece of demographic data like a residential handle.

“The third kind of authentication assumes that an individual’s Aadhaar quantity is non-public,” mentioned Prakash. “Having an Aadhaar quantity out there on the general public web makes this type of authentication unviable.”

Along with this week’s breach, Aadhaar numbers have been made public at varied instances up to now. In November 2017, as an illustration, greater than 200 authorities web sites accidentally exposed 1000’s of individuals’s Aadhaar numbers. In Might, 2017, researchers estimated that leaky authorities web sites have uncovered the information of 130 million individuals. And in March 2017, a authorities company accidentally included the Aadhaar particulars of M. S. Dhoni, the captain of the Indian cricket staff, in a tweet that was pulled down solely when Dhoni’s spouse tweeted angrily at India’s data and expertise minister.

Nilekani’s critics say that he ought to have exercised extra warning earlier than tweeting an image of his Aadhaar card. “He was little doubt conscious that this was delicate data that he was placing out, and it was unhealthy precedent for him to be doing this as essentially the most seen evangelist for Aadhaar,” mentioned Kiran Jonnalagadda, a member of the volunteer-led Web Freedom Basis, which works on privateness, freedom of expression, and internet neutrality points in India.

Nikhil Pahwa, one other member of the Basis and a staunch Aadhaar critic, mentioned that Nilekani’s “mistake reveals that generally, even apparently tech savvy individuals make errors.” Pahwa thinks that the Aadhaar program wants a strategy to revoke or change an Aadhaar quantity — one thing that’s presently unimaginable. “Whereas Mr. Nilekani could not personally face points due to this foolishness,” he mentioned, “spare a thought for widespread individuals whose Aadhaar particulars have been leaked.”

Source link

قالب وردپرس

J. Crew Just Apologized For A Black Model's Seriously Controversial Hairstyle

“They didn’t even attempt.”

Madewell is a well-liked model identified for its vintage-looking denims and its “cool lady” aesthetic. Suppose no-makeup make-up and tousled #iwokeuplikethis hair.

Madewell is a popular brand known for its vintage-looking jeans and its "cool girl" aesthetic. Think no-makeup makeup and tousled #iwokeuplikethis hair.

Madewell is a J. Crew model btw.

Madewell / By way of

Nicely one mannequin’s coiffure has gone viral and sparked a significant magnificence debate. Individuals are very divided on whether or not her hair is simply a part of the model’s carefree aesthetic, or if it was simply poorly styled for the photoshoot.

Well one model’s hairstyle has gone viral and sparked a major beauty debate. People are very divided on whether her hair is just part of the brand’s carefree aesthetic, or if it was just poorly styled for the photoshoot.

Simply to be clear, folks aren't debating whether or not the mannequin herself seems good or unhealthy as a result of she's clearly STUNNING. It’s strictly concerning the hair.

Madewell / By way of

@rosechocglam / By way of Twitter: @rosechocglam

Extra particularly, they’re accusing the model of not hiring a hairstylist who may correctly look after and elegance the mannequin’s texture on the photoshoot.

More specifically, they're accusing the brand of not hiring a hairstylist who could properly care for and style the model's texture at the photoshoot.

@itskatdarling / By way of Twitter: @itskatdarling

Some persons are additionally claiming that this is not the primary time a style model has disregarded a black mannequin’s hairstyling…

Some people are also claiming that this isn't the first time a fashion brand has disregarded a black model's hairstyling...

@fr3nchrayne / By way of Twitter: @fr3nchrayne

However, you could have folks saying her hair seems cute in an easy mattress head kinda approach.

On the other hand, you have people saying her hair looks cute in an effortless bed head kinda way.

@champagnegina / By way of Twitter: @champagnegina

And a few people assume that the mannequin’s look is being held to unfair requirements just because she’s not white.

And some folks think that the model's appearance is being held to unfair standards simply because she's not white.

@sidewalksrih / By way of Twitter: @sidewalksrih

Folks had such robust opinions that the talk went viral and made its approach again to the mannequin, whose title is Marihenny. She told The Shade Room that “the idea of the model particularly is to indicate that garments could be comfy wearable and naturally lovely [sic]. So the pure hair and make-up matches proper in.”

People had such strong opinions that the debate went viral and made its way back to the model, whose name is Marihenny. She told The Shade Room that "the concept of the brand specifically is to show that clothes can be comfortable wearable and naturally beautiful [sic]. So the natural hair and makeup fits right in."

@theshaderoom / By way of

J. Crew additionally weighed in, in the end tweeting an apology “for the styling of this mannequin and the offense that was triggered.”

J. Crew also weighed in, ultimately tweeting an apology "for the styling of this model and the offense that was caused."

@jcrew / By way of Twitter: @jcrew

Source link

قالب وردپرس